+ heartofrecycling.net »  :::: General Section » General Discussion » Wonders and Mysteries of the World
|- Amazing Fact ¦~ About " Taj Mahal "


10% SBI and 10% Discount

Amazing Fact ¦~ About " Taj Mahal "

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

June 06, 2014, 03:29:29 PM
  • ßØÑD = No Limits. No Fears. No Substitutes.
  • Junior Mod (Inactive)
  • Royal Member
  • ***
  • Topic Author
  • Thank You: 552
  • Reputation: 115
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Country: in
  • Posts: 1005
  • Topics: 315
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • $HÅ®€$PÄ®K = ߀$T ïÑ TH€ WØ®LD


No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ). In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh.

Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.

Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on TwitterShare this topic on Yahoo

« Last Edit: June 06, 2014, 03:30:51 PM by 007MIs »



  
007 is Number One! The Excitement Never Stops and The Thrills Never End!

Thanks given by:


June 06, 2014, 03:35:52 PM
Reply #1
  • Semi Newbie
  • **
  • Thank You: 14
  • Reputation: 4
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Country: it
  • Posts: 46
  • Topics: 21
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • ShareSpark Member
Yes there are total 110 Evidence that it was a Hindu temple. I will Post Complete Article in Next days

December 27, 2014, 10:49:50 PM
Reply #2
  • Devoted Member
  • **
  • Thank You: 9
  • Reputation: 4
  • Activity:
    0.2%
  • Posts: 170
  • Topics: 42
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • ShareSpark Member
An dange karoange ab rehne do everyone know this is Hindu country everywhere is temple where Muslim temple there

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
1753 Views
Last post January 29, 2011, 03:02:41 PM
by Admin ♥♫
18 Replies
7324 Views
Last post September 06, 2012, 12:24:36 AM
by Ńαʌєєи
18 Replies
12621 Views
Last post January 02, 2017, 09:27:48 PM
by Randalllenrit
1 Replies
3628 Views
Last post August 09, 2013, 11:24:32 AM
by sαgαя15sнαн
0 Replies
669 Views
Last post May 24, 2014, 01:49:19 PM
by 007MIs




Back to top
Sitemap